Invitation to tender: Management Development Programme (MDP)

Vacancy - consultant

Invitation to tender: Management Development Programme (MDP)

WFD is re-tendering its Management Development Programme (MDP) contract, originally established in 2019, to find a new partner that aligns with our current and future needs and offers good value for money for the next four years. We seek proposals for MDPs that will support the ongoing development of management skills across our international workforce.
Image
""

ITT Reference number: ITT_2024_MDP

Summary 

WFD established its current Management Development Programme (MDP) in 2019 working with our selected provider from an open tender. The organisation is now re-tendering the contract to ensure WFD has the right partner and MDP that best suits our current and future needs and provides good value for money for the next 4 years. We are therefore looking to receive proposals for MDPs that meet the requirement detailed in this document and support the ongoing development of our management skills across our international workforce. 

Overview 

Westminster Foundation for Democracy (“WFD”) is the UK public body dedicated to supporting democracy around the world. Operating internationally, WFD works with parliaments, political parties, and civil society groups as well as on elections to help make political systems fairer, more inclusive and more accountable. 

We are a problem-solving, practitioner-led organisation that offers:

  • High quality and impactful regional and country programmes that directly support the full spectrum of institutions in political systems to develop inclusive political processes, more accountable political systems, protection of rights and freedoms, and more pluralistic societies.  
  • Specialist analysis, research, and advice to inform UK policy makers on a range of democratic governance issues through our Centre of Expertise.   
  • International elections observation on behalf of the UK.  

WFD’s organisational structure consists of a headquarters, based in London, employing circa 60 full time staff in programme delivery, technical advisory and business support roles. We operate an agile working model in the UK, which supports remote-based, office-based and hybrid working. Our head office teams provide organisational leadership and operational support to circa 125 locally engaged programme delivery staff, located in our (circa 30) international programme field offices. Within our global structure, approximately 55 staff have line management responsibilities. 

More details of WFD’s strategy, programme activity and international footprint is available on our website.

The aim of this Invitation to Tender

WFD is issuing this Invitation to Tender (“ITT”) to procure goods/services in accordance with the conditions detailed in this document. 

The fundamental purpose of our Management Development Programme is to establish a strong, consistent and best practice standard of management skills and implementation by all our Line Manager across the organisation, resulting in a high level of staff engagement, retention and satisfaction. 

Over the past 4 years, WFD has invested substantial resources into developing our managers and codifying what we expect of them. Objective 4.1 of our current ‘outstanding organisation strategy’ (which sets out our strategic direction for our people, operations and systems agendas) aims to ensure WFD has ‘Great Managers’- 

“We will equip our managers with the skills and tools for teams to thrive, support wellbeing, and deliver high performance, whilst embracing difference and recognising individual contributions.”

The MDP is a crucial product in supporting the delivery of the above objective, and we are committed to the continued development of our managers.  We believe ‘great managers’ are fundamental to a positive employment experience and critical for staff to be retained and thrive at WFD. We believe that a consistently high standard of experience of line management by our teams will further improve WFD’s reputation as an employer and allow us to manage a significant portion of our people and culture-based risk. 

Since we developed and introduced our MDP in 2019, there have been some major changes in our ways of work, with the primary example of this being the COVID-19 pandemic. Like all organisations, this drove WFD to adopt a remote working model, which since the end of the pandemic, WFD has cultivated into our current agile work model. This has meant an increased level of remote working for teams, which requires a more flexible management model for the organisation. The other major lesson learned from the pandemic, and subsequent remote based working, was the need for the organisation and our managers to prioritise staff wellbeing; WFD recognises the key role managers play in ensuring their staff feel supported and able to navigate personal challenges and work-related pressures and stresses. In a post-COVID working environment, it is crucial that our management practices continue to evolve and be responsive to the pressures of an increasingly distributed workforce. A large part of this is related to the psychological contract that line managers and our staff members have, and we believe that clear expectation setting on both sides will enable us to provide consistency here. 

WFD is a very culturally diverse organisation with staff based in over 30 countries globally. Within these Country Teams, there are different cultural understanding and interpretation about what ‘good management’ looks like; including how managers demonstrate authority and responsibility, and the level of comfort and familiarity they have with certain management tools (i.e. performance appraisals). As WFD strives for high management standards, we also need to recognise the cultural norms and context that may play into the approaches adopted and applied by our managers.   

The results from our 2024 annual employee engagement survey show that we need to do more to encourage managers to help staff reach their full potential (i.e. development and growth). Additionally, managers need to be stronger on motivating and ensuring staff to feel satisfied by and engaged in their work. There was also feedback that managers need to be doing more listening and less telling, so their staff feel more supported and cared for. Given the ongoing cost of living pressures and the challenges for employers to keep salaries at levels that can act as a motivator for employees, it’s important that managers understand what non-compensatory factors make a difference when it comes to recognition, reward and engagement, and can apply this to ensure staff feel valued. 

A significant challenge for WFD managers is responding to the needs of individuals within the frameworks and context in which we operate. These include: 

  1. As a UK Arms-Length Body of the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, WFD is obligated to comply with certain operational frameworks (i.e. structural and pay and reward).
  2. WFD is also a relatively small organisation, which despite certain benefits, can create challenges around opportunities for progression.
  3. Our funding model can mean that there are also challenges around pay and reward, as well as WFD needing to be creative and efficient when it comes to supporting staff learning and development.

The above context means that WFD managers often need to find a balance between supporting and motivating staff and managing expectations. We, therefore, need to ensure managers have the skills and tools to communicate effectively with their staff and manage these potentially difficult conversations. Managing staff within the WFD context will be a key element of the MDP. 

WFD has an established competency and skills framework (ANNEX 2), which consists of our six core competency areas of:

  • We respect and support colleagues
  • We demonstrate business awareness
  • We embrace innovation and change
  • We deliver quality and impact
  • We demonstrate leadership 
  • We build partnerships and networks

Under each core competency area there is a set of behaviours which are described at three levels; (1) support level, (2) management level and (3) strategic level; and, a set of skills and knowledge areas which help guide staff on the learning and development required to ensure they are able to demonstrate competence in the required areas. All our line managers are operating at the management level or strategic level (with the vast majority at the management level), and you will note that throughout the framework, there is reference to line management skills under a number of competencies and that the described behaviours are those that we would want (and expect) to see in our managers. The MDP should equip our managers with the skills and knowledge to be able to demonstrate the required behaviours under each of the relevant core competency areas and to apply a management style that aligns with our culture and organisation values (see ANNEX 3). 

Across all of our operations, WFD currently employs over 55 staff who have line management responsibilities as a core part of their role. Most of our managers are responsible for teams ranging from 5 staff, to just one direct report (please see ANNEX 1 organisational chart attached for more detials on our staffing structure). 

We are seeking to procure an L&D partner to design and deliver a module based management development training programme to our managers. Due to our international workforce, the programme will need to be delivered virtually by a live facilititator. Online materials and learning platforms may also be used to support the delivery of the programme. We would also welcome proposals that offer a 2 tier approach of (1) a more comphrensive programme for new/less experienced managers, and (2) a refresher programme for more experienced managers, introducing the minimum standards expected when managing people at WFD. 

Programme design and coordination will be finalised throughout October – December 2024, with the first cohort kicking off in January 2024. The programme will then run on a rolling basis until December 2028. 

Bid submission 

All bids should be in a format that complies with the requirements of this ITT. 

Bids should be submitted by email to: Jon Spence, People and Culture Director, at procurement@wfd.org. We recommend that bids are submitted in PDF format where possible, except for spreadsheets where required.  

Bids should refer clearly to the ITT reference number: OPSD/MDP/2024.  

Should you require any further information or clarification on this ITT, please contact Jon Spence, People and Culture Director, at procurement@wfd.org.  

By submitting a bid, you agree to comply with WFD’s standard terms and conditions for tendering and key policies and WFD’s Code of Conduct.  

Tender information

Introduction

This document is an ITT and it forms part of the procurement exercise to support the selection of a supplier, to enter a contract. The aim of this document is to identify functional and commercial requirements and provide instructions for submitting responses.  This document will also provide vital information as it relates to evaluation criteria and forms the basis for contractual arrangements. 

This ITT is not an offer to contract; it is a definition of specific requirements and an invitation to submit a response addressing such requirements. WFD may modify these requirements in whole or in part and/or seek additional bidders to submit information/bids. WFD will not be liable to you for any losses or damages suffered by you because of the specific requirements or any amendment to such requirements.

Detailed scope and specification of this ITT

Proposals will be required to demonstrate how they aim to meet the following specification:

 

Specification Requirement

 

Proposals should contain confirmation/evidence of the following:

 

Essential

Desirable

 

 

 

 

Programme delivery timeline

 

  1. Ability to design programme content and materials by 29th November (will require WFD sign off). 
  2. Delivery timetable for all programme training workshops and other related planning and delivery activities (i.e. programme design, participant follow up/communications, feedback, programme evaluation, etc) 

Note: We are looking to deliver the training modules (for all cohorts/participants) from January 2024 and on an ongoing basis, based on demand over a 4 year period.

We anticipate approx. 10-15 Line Managers per year needing to go through the MDP

 

 

Systems

Subscription to, and experience with using required online training systems/platforms to deliver workshops – please specify the system/platform that will be used. 

NOTE: WFD’s preference would be MS Team as this is the system we use and therefore it is most familiar and compatible with our systems/network

Specify any other systems utilised to support delivery of development programme or individual learning for participants

 

Methodology 

 

 

  1. Clearly defined approach for delivering the workshops (i.e. structure of overall programme and individual workshops.
  2. Details of any pre-course design planning meetings/sessions with WFD. Details on evalution of participant learning (i.e. skills and knowledge before and after). This should meeting the main criteria as described in the ‘aim of this Invitation to Tender’ section above.
  3. Post course/module planning support for participants, i.e. Applying the learning to their work 
  4. Any recommended input support required from WFD inhouse expertise (i.e. the People Team) working in partnership to deliver/re-enforce any aspects of the learning
  1. Action learning sets or other peer to peer support/learning approach that could be built into the programme 
  2. Details of any delegate pre-course preparation required.
  3. Clear specification of any additional/unique elements to the methodology.

 

 

 

 

 

Content

 

 

The curriculum for the programme should be aligned to best practice/recognised standards for management skills development.

Training workshops must include skills, knowledge and capacity development in the following areas:

  1. Managing performance - goal setting, monitoring, feedback, etc.
  2. Managing difficult conversations
  3. Support individual development needs  
  4. Introduction to coaching skills
  5. Delegation and prioritisation 
  6. Effective management communication
  7. Developing teams
  8. Motivation, engagement and reward
  9. Workload management and effective prioritisation 
  10. Managing conflict and confrontation  
  11. Emotional intelligence, self-awareness and establishing trust and psychological safety
  12. Role modelling behaviours (WFD organisation values – ANNEX 3)
Please specify any other core line management skills that you would see appropriate to this programme

 

 

Materials/Resources

  1. Details of the programme materials and resource that will be available to delegates (i.e. PowerPoints, videos, podcast, online learning tool, etc).
  2. Please specify any reliance on WFD’s People (or other) team’s time and/or WFD resources required to deliver this programme
Details of access to any additional relevant learning materials and/or resources
Trainers / Facilitators and other expertise Bios for all trainers/facilitators who would have responsibility for delivering workshops If there is specific expertise at the disposal of the provider (i.e. in developing content, methodology or delivery, then please specify

 

 

Costs

  1. Full costed budget proposal - linking all associated costs to delivery/activities. This should include a breakdown of the cost per MDP course/cohort, and separately, and associated design costs.
  2. Confirmation of payment terms

 

 

 

Recommendations / References

Minimum of two recommendations / references from previous clients Recommendations/reference will relate to previous management training / development programmes provided  

 

Accreditations

  If the course and/or facilitator(s) would provide any industry / sector recognised accreditation

 

 

Additional Features

Certificate for participants on completion of the course (preferably issued against an accredited status/by an accredited body)  Re-usable summary package of contextualised learning materials/short e-learning modules/presentations to support WFD in providing internal capacity building for new managers in between the period of them joining and participating in the management development programme

Reporting

Following each cohort, the supplier will be required to share evaluation reports, and on an annual basis WFD will arrange a broader evaluation discussion to assess the impact and effectiveness of the programme.

Working arrangements

Due to our international workforce, the programme will need to be delivered virtually by a live facilititator. Online materials and learning platforms may also be used to support the delivery of the programme. We would also welcome proposals that offer a 2 tier approach of (1) a more comphrensive programme for new/less experienced managers, and (2) a refresher programme for more experienced managers, introducing the minimum standards expected when managing people at WFD. 

Payments

WFD’s payment terms under this contract will be 30 days from receiving a valid invoice following satisfactory receipt of the services. 

This will be a 4-year framework agreement with a single supplier, terminating December 2028. The estimated contract value (over 4 years) is £40,000 - £60,000, with payment on satisfactory delivery of each course. This estimate excludes programme design costs, but these should be clearly set out in the proposal.

Timescale 

Below is the proposed timescale for the tendering process. Please note the dates are indicative and subject to change.

Description

Date

Issue ITT

15 August 2024

Close date for supplier questions

30 August 2024

Closing date for receipt of completed tender proposals

23:59, 4 September 2024

Shortlisting of bids

2 - 13 September 2024

Supplier interviews/presentations to selection panel 

16 – 20 September 2024

WFD announces preferred supplier

By 30 September 2024

Contract finalised and signed

By 11 October 2024

Bid requirements

In general, the bid should include the following:

  1. Organisational profile
  2. Proposed solution and how it meets the specification 
  3. Financial proposal 
  4. References 
  5. Confirmation of compliance with General Terms and Conditions of Tendering

Organisational profile: 

  • Company profile, including brief history and financial overview
  • Case studies/credentials demonstrating relevant experience and skills profile 
  • Names and brief biographies of key staff 

WFD is particularly keen to receive bids from organisations which are – or are working towards becoming – living wage employers and that have a broadly representative and balanced Board from gender and ethnicity perspectives. 

Proposed solution: 

  • Clear explanation as to the proposed approach to meeting the specification set out in this ITT. 
  • Detailed project plan, including timelines, assumptions and dependencies, resourcing and risks. 

Financial proposal: 

  • Full breakdown costings for the proposed solution in GBP.
  • Separate accounting of VAT and/or any other applicable tax, duty, or charge. 
  • Detailing of any discount applied in view of WFD’s not-for-profit status. 

References:

  • The bid should include details of two references relating to similar goods/services provided in the last three years. Please note – referees will only be contacted once Preferred Bidder status is assigned.

Confirmation of acceptance of general terms and conditions of tendering: 

  • All bidders will be deemed to have accepted the WFD Terms and Conditions of Tendering and confirmed their compliance. 
  • All bidders should also note the following: 
  • all bids should be submitted in English; 
  • all bids should be submitted in electronic form only;
  • this ITT and the response may be incorporated in whole or in part into the final contract;
  • only information provided in response to questions set out in this documentation will be taken into consideration for the purposes of evaluating the ITT;
  • bids which are poorly organised or poorly written, such that evaluation and comparison with other submissions is notably difficult, may exclude the bidder from further consideration; and
  • any bids which do not fully comply with the requirements of this ITT may be disregarded at the absolute discretion of WFD. 

Evaluation criteria 

WFD intends to shortlist providers based on their response to the ITT and will use the following scoring criteria.  

Description  Score   
Quality of bid and fit to Specification 

40%

Value for money 

25%

Relevant experience  

25%

Professional profile, track record and references 

10%

Total Weighting 

100 %

WFD will score each criterion using the following table: 

The proposal submitted omits and fundamentally fails to meet WFD’s scope and specifications. Insufficient evidence to support the proposal to allow WFD to evaluate. Not Answered  
The information submitted has a severe lack of evidence to demonstrate that WFD’s scope and specifications can be met. Significant omissions, serious and/or many concerns. Poor 
The information submitted has some minor omissions in respect of WFD's scope and specifications. The tender satisfies the basic requirements in some respects but is unsatisfactory in other respects and raises some concerns. Satisfactory.  
The information submitted provides some good evidence to meet the WFD’s scope and specifications and is satisfactory in most respects and there are few concerns. Good.  
The information submitted provides good evidence that all of WFD's scope and specification can be met. Full and robust response, any concerns are addressed so that the proposal gives confidence. Very Good. 
The information submitted provides strong evidence that all of WFD's scope and specification can be met and the proposal exceeds expectation i.e. exemplary in the industry. Provides full confidence and no concerns. Outstanding 

Tender queries 

Any questions related to this tender should be addressed to Jon Spence, People and Culture Director at procurement@wfd.org

Equal information

Should any supplier raise a question that is of general interest, WFD reserves the right to circulate both question and answer to other respondents, either via WFD’s website or by email. In this event, anonymity will be maintained.

Annual reports

Please provide a link or copy of your company’s latest audited annual accounts with the bid.

Other information

If the potential supplier believes that there is additional information that has not been requested in the ITT but is relevant to your bid, please include that information as a separate attachment and explain its relevance to this ITT.

Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

Below are answers to common questions from suppliers.

Are you actually looking to change Training Partner/Provider, and if so, why?

WFD periodically retender our contracts in line with our internal procurement policy. This is to ensure that we are delivering the best possible value for money and that we considering new and different ideas on content and approaches to ensure we’re delivering the highest possible impact for our organisation.  All proposals will be assessed against the criteria stated in the ITT, and the contract will be awarded to the supplier who best meets the contract requirements and offers the best value for money.

What is your current Training Partner not providing for you that has led you to review the service they currently provide, and/or why do you feel they are unable to support your organisation over the coming 4 years?

WFD periodically retender our contracts in line with our internal procurement policy. This is to ensure that we are delivering the best possible value for money and that we considering new and different ideas on content and approaches to ensure we’re delivering the highest possible impact for our organisation. We are unable to comment on the performance of incumbent suppliers 

Are you looking for an Accredited Management Development Programme or purely bespoke? If Accredited, does that apply to both levels?

The ‘accreditation’ has been marked as a desirable criteria in our specification. This is an investment for WFD and for those Managers who complete the programme and therefore, it would be desirable if our managers were able to secure a professional accreditation acknowledging their effort and development. Therefore if this is possible, then this would add weight to a proposal, however, we accept there could be limitations here, especially given the vast geographic spread of our Managers.  

Can you please advise of the functional English Language level of the potential attendees, in all 4 skills?

All WFD staff, regardless of their location have a strong level of English. As a UK organisation, the majority of our communication with global staff is in English (including internal communications, policies, reporting, etc.)

Is it possible to have sight of the previous MDP, please?

For reasons of commercial sensitivity, we are unable to share any content from our current MDP.

Will the same personnel be attending this new programme as attended the previous programme?

The MDP is offered to all WFD managers when they join the organisation or receive internal promotion. They are not expected to repeat the programme unless there are individual performance reasons for doing so.

With regard to a two-tier approach to the MDP, what might the rough split be of new/more experienced managers, per year?

This is difficult to accurately quantify as it will depend on turnover and internal progress, and the level of experience individuals have when taking up line management roles. However, we would estimate around 50%, as the new manager programmes could be offered as a development opportunity for some colleagues in advance of them moving into a management role. 

In relation to the industry/sector recognised accreditation, please can you advise as to the organisation whose accreditations you would accept?

The ‘accreditation’ has been marked as a desirable criteria in our specification. This is an investment for WFD and for those Managers who complete the programme and therefore, it would be desirable if our managers were able to secure a professional accreditation acknowledging their effort and development. Therefore if this is possible, then this would add weight to a proposal, however, we accept there could be limitations here, especially given the vast geographic spread of our Managers.  

Are you looking for an Accredited Management Development Programme or purely bespoke? If Accredited, does that apply to both levels?

WFD does not have any preconceived expectations about the type of accreditation – we are open to receiving options from prospective suppliers in their proposals.

In relation to the certification of the course (preferably issued against an accredited status/by an accredited body), please can you advise which accreditations and accredited bodies would you accept?

See response above. The minimum requirement here is staff receive a basic certificate confirming they have attended an internal training course, however, if the programme holds an accreditation, it would be great for delegates to receive an accredited certificate. 

In the tender you say payment will take place after “satisfactory delivery”. How do you judge delivery as satisfactory or not? Do you have specific KPIs that need to be hit, is it feedback based, or do you have a different metric?

The criteria and KPIs for‘Satisfactory delivery’ will be determined and agreed as part of the contract with the chosen supplier. 

The budget excludes design, but do you have a set design budget in mind as well? Will design costs have any bearing on the pricing score we receive?

We do not have a designated design budget agreed, but recognise that there will likely be some associated design costs. We will need to consider the overall value for money of the programme, which will include any associated design costs. 

You talk about Objective 4.1 in your current “outstanding organisation strategy”. This doesn’t seem to align with the strategy on your website. Is there a more up-to-date strategy that has been developed that you could share with us please?

This link is to WFD’s Organisational Strategy, however, the outstanding organisation strategy is a separate internal strategy focused on operational excellence and strong employee engagement.

You have 55 managers in scope across 30+ countries, with 10-15 expected to go through the programme each year. Would they all be in a single cohort, or would you be expecting smaller cohorts of, say, 5 leaders from a specific country?

Question continued: If they’re all in a single cohort, will WFD group them in close time zones, so that we don’t run the risk of running a workshop at a time that suits somebody in Venezuela but is prohibitive for your manager in Malaysia? 

We are interested in and open to suggestions on how best to deliver this programme - therefore, the cohort size is flexible depending on the approach, so we could accommodate multiple cohorts. We would always look to group managers based on time zones so that wherever possible, colleagues can participate within their core business hours. 

Regarding Contents of the programme – Effective management communication (no. 6 on Content requirements) – this is a very wide topic. What specific learning outcomes do you have in mind for this? Or what specific problems are you trying to address?

We appreciate that this is a broad topic and feel that effective management communication is a key theme which underpins the other content areas throughout the MDP; for example, delivering feedback, delegation, coaching, psychological safety, managing difficult conversations etc. It may also cover areas such as active listening skills, non-verbal communication, adapting communication styles to suit the context/individual. We welcome any suggestions or best practice advice on this area and would be happy to discuss these during a design stage. There are no specific problems with management communication that we need to address, purely we aim to ensure that our Line Managers are equipped with the tools, techniques and skills required to communicate effectively.

Regarding contents of the programme – Developing Teams (no. 7 in Content requirements). What specific learning outcomes do you have in mind for this?

Question continued: E.g. is this about managing different people or working styles/creating a sense of team/workload planning in teams, etc? How do you see this as different from Leading Teams?  NB, we see Leadership skills as particularly suited to more senior/strategic level managers with larger teams who need to step back from the day-to-day management, instead setting direction and focusing on who they are as a leader and how they are being.  This is a less skills-based approach – and much more self-development on mindset and behaviours.

We would like our Line Managers to effectively develop a strong team cohesion and sense of team belonging, for example through shared goals and purpose, clear team responsibilities, empowering team members, clear and agreed standards, mutual trust and respect, and strong team communication. As above, we welcome any suggestions or best practice advice on this area and would be happy to discuss these during a design stage. As the MDP audience is all WFD Line Managers (i.e. not just senior/strategic level managers), this content needs to be suitable for all levels of management.

In the Additional Features part: You mention in Desirable "Re-usable summary package of contextualised learning materials/short e-learning modules/presentations to support WFD in providing internal capacity building for new managers...

in between the period of them joining and participating in the management development programme". Question: How exactly do you anticipate this being used/what do you want it to include - specifically regarding learning materials/presentations/guides?  And who would be delivering this within WFD?

Occasionally, there is a delay between a new Line Manager joining WFD and the next available date that they can join a Management Development Programme (MDP). In order to enhance management skills during this time, it would be desirable if WFD could provide them with some self-led learning materials to review in their own time whilst they await the next MDP. This could be PowerPoint slides or Guidance documents giving a high-level overview of the key learnings from the MDP, as an interim solution until the next course becomes available. We would not expect a WFD staff member to deliver this content but just support with providing Line Managers with the self-learning materials.

Costs. Whilst you are seeking a contract for 2025-2028, we will be unable to fix our fees for that duration due to variation in our supplier/facilitator fees and market conditions.

Continued: Are you open to a 2025 fee proposal, with confirmation of annual fees in advance of each year the programme runs?  We will of course endeavour to minimise any increases.

We accept that not all suppliers will be able to offer a fixed cost for the duration of the contract. In the absence of a fixed cost, the bid should either set out costs year by year or provide a clear formula for calculating any cost increases, along with the frequency of any proposed increases.

In the section, ‘Confirmation of acceptance of General Terms and Conditions of Tendering’ it says: All bidders will be deemed to have accepted the WFD Terms and Conditions of Tendering and confirmed their compliance.

Continued: What are you wanting to see in this section, just a short sentence stating that we accept the Terms and Conditions?

Answer: Nothing is required in writing, unless the supplier wishes to do so. By submitting a bid, it will be deemed that these Terms and Conditions have been accepted.

Without eroding professional confidentiality or sharing intellectual property, how much will the 'new' supplier be able to know about the previous MDP to ensure there is no contradiction / difference or make explanations if there is?

There will be some limitations about sharing specific content and materials from the current MDP due to commercial sensitivity and intellectual property rights, however, WFD will work closely with the selected provider at the design phase to ensure the new programme remains aligned with core content and principles. 

You mention a post-covid focus model for the organisation on significant remote working and a focus on colleague wellbeing. What processes have already been put in place organisationally to help with these and how do these impact Managers?

WFD adopted an agile working model in 2021 and is in the process of implementing a similar model (taking account of local needs/preferences) across our country-office network. With this model, staff can choose whether they are office-based, remote-based, or work in a hybrid pattern. The main impact on managers has therefore been that they don’t necessarily get regular in-person time with their Teams and therefore need to adopt remote management techniques. This requires a stronger focus on outcome-focused objective setting and monitoring performance through regular 121 discussions. Managers are also required to monitor staff wellbeing for their team. Wellbeing discussions have become a key part of 121 meetings. If a wellbeing issue is identified, Managers will be expected to respond, which may involve managing workload pressures, sign-posting support and resources (i.e. EAP, or internal Wellbeing Focal Points), or escalating serious issues where needed. 

How far up the organogram is the training being offered/undertaken?

The MDP is offered to all WFD managers when they join the organisation or receive internal promotion – this is regardless of level, so will include Programme/Functional Managers, right up to Director-level managers.

In a 2-tier approach, will colleagues be allowed to choose which level they do or will it be defined for them? Will you allow people to do both levels if they want to?

Decisions will be made in consultation with individuals and their managers about which level would be most suitable. In principle, Managers could attend both courses if there is a case for this.

Do any of the intended participants have any specific sensory or neurodivergence needs?

We would assess any specific sensory or neurodivergence needs for managers at the planning stage for each cohort. If adjustments are required, we will discuss this with the provider to ensure any specific needs are managed. 

We are a small business and only have unaudited Companies House accounts. Is this going to cause a problem?

We can accept relevant equivalent accounts as part of the due diligence process. If there are additional assurances required, WFD will work with the selected providers to manage this.